On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Elliott Hird <[email protected]> wrote: > Curry's paradox. Lovely thing. (Pity AnMaster seems deluded into > thinking it's invalid.) > > There is no answer I can give but TRUE; so I give it. > > Note that CFJs are merely *guidance* - so it may turn out this > judgment is woefully unreflective of reality (despite being logically > true.)
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. The statement of the CFJ is nonsensical, and thus UNDETERMINED is the only appropriate judgement.
