On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 11:37 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Elliott Hird > <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2009/4/27 Geoffrey Spear <[email protected]>: > >> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. The statement of > >> the CFJ is nonsensical, and thus UNDETERMINED is the only appropriate > >> judgement. > > > > Please do not clutch at straws. It is perfectly sensical. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry's_paradox > > It's a paradox. Of course it's not "sensical".
I don't believe that the opinion that all paradoxes are necessarily nonsensical is one supported by the ruleset. Anyway, I support, suggesting UNDECIDABLE; ehird's judgement may be logically true, but according to the majority opinion of Agorans seems to be factually incorrect, and TRUE is only appropriate if the statement is both factually and logically true. -- ais523
