On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Elliott Hird > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Curry's paradox. Lovely thing. (Pity AnMaster seems deluded into >> thinking it's invalid.) >> >> There is no answer I can give but TRUE; so I give it. >> >> Note that CFJs are merely *guidance* - so it may turn out this >> judgment is woefully unreflective of reality (despite being logically >> true.) > > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. The statement of > the CFJ is nonsensical, and thus UNDETERMINED is the only appropriate > judgement.
I support, but I argue for UNDECIDABLE. The statement makes perfect sense to me. Having received the necessary support, I appeal this judgement. -root
