On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > Tanner Swett wrote: >> The last sentence, in parentheses, might not be a great idea. Without >> it, we have to say "I extend the deadline" whenever someone calls a >> case, which is easy enough; with it, every CFJ that is only marginally >> relevant to the event could lead to a second CFJ that is also >> marginally relevant to the event, which (in theory) could lead to an >> infinite s cascade of CFJs. > > > Hence the "substantially".
Even so, there's still a fuzzy line, isn't there? —adiosToreador
