After reading all the discussion on the subject so far, I have a question arising in my mind. If the man really wanted to help the widow and wanted her to be his life partner, then why did he not marry her first and perform the sexual communion later? He took her to the guesthouse and had sex with her, on the pretext of making her meet a lawyer. This itself shows that the man's main motive was to satisfy his lust from her.
On 7/28/17, swati saxena via Ai <ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in> wrote: > Well, maintaining clean distance or having / not having sex only after > getting married is subject to individual's choice. > > But what has become clear from this whole discourse is that our > society is still insensitive even to an extremely sensitive situation > of a rape victim. The ones who are open minded, interpret the > situation in simplistic way undermining the undercurrents to which > women are still subjected to in our society, while others cannot even > come out of male chauvinism and put the blame of her situation on the > female itself, going to the extent of questioning her character and > sensibilities as happened in the bygone era. > > In this case, even if according to certain thoughts it was a > consensual sex, what still remains a question is that what really we > mean by consensus. Asking for a choice after making someone a victim > of their atrocities, creating dependency in every sense, breaking > someone emotionally, leaving no / limited choice for her and then > asking for consensus is really not consensus according to my belief. I > will leave on others to spare a thought to it and decide what free > consensus according to them really is. Did the lady really have had a > free choice to decide whether or not to indulge into sexual > relationship with Mr. Kapoor repeatedly over the course of time? > > I continue to believe that Mr. Kapoor deserves the punishment of > harshest kind because this whole case exists because he raped her in > the guest house in the first instance and the convict should not be > spared what so ever the situation is. No innocent deed at later stage > can justify a gruesome crime of rape. > > I will stop my comments on this issue for now as most of the thoughts > are repeating only. > Disclaimer: > 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the > person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; > > 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails > sent through this mailing list.. > > > > To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: > https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html > _______________________________________________ > > > Ai mailing list > Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in > http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai > -- Avichal bhatnagar Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. To check if the post reached the list or to search for old posting, reach: https://www.mail-archive.com/ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/maillist.html _______________________________________________ Ai mailing list Ai@accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in http://accessindia.inclusivehabitat.in/mailman/listinfo/ai
