@ Aditya: Mac's Solution works correctly....for your example:

Start from 24(top right)..24>5: go left;    9>5: go left;     1<3: go
down;   2<3:go down:  3 found..:)



On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Naveen Kumar <naveenkumarve...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I think if x < a[n/2][n/2] than we need to search in 1st quadrant otherwise
> in others.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:20 PM, sourabh jakhar <sourabhjak...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> aditya solution is correct
>> it is a standard question of young tabuleau
>> it is complexity is log(n)
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:52 PM, ADITYA KUMAR <aditya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> @MAC
>>> ur solution is wrong
>>>
>>> 1 9 24
>>> 2 12 33
>>> 3 16 49
>>>
>>> search for 3
>>>
>>>
>>> O(logn) solution
>>> let the matrix be A[][] and number to be searched is x
>>> divide the array from middle in 4 parts lets say it four quadrants
>>> now check if x>A[n/2][n/2] search in bottom right quadrant
>>> if x<A[n/2][n/2] search in other 3 quadrants
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 8:25 AM, yq Zhang <zhangyunq...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Suppose you have a matrix n*m. each column and row of the matrix is
>>>> already sorted. For example:
>>>>
>>>> 1,2,3
>>>> 2,3,4
>>>> 4,5,6
>>>>
>>>> All 3 rows and 3 columns of above matrix are sorted. How to find a
>>>> specific number in the matrix?
>>>> The trivial O(nlogm) solution is to use binary search for all rows. I
>>>> am looking for better solution.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards
>>> Aditya Kumar
>>> B-tech 3rd year
>>> Computer Science & Engg.
>>> MNNIT, Allahabad.
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> SOURABH JAKHAR,(CSE)(3 year)
>> ROOM NO 167 ,
>> TILAK,HOSTEL
>> 'MNNIT ALLAHABAD
>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Naveen Kumar
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>



-- 
Regards,
Ankit Babbar

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to