yes...but if you want to find second best and third best and so on...then you need to consider all loser to first winner and so on....think on this line......
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:14 PM, bittu <shashank7andr...@gmail.com> wrote: > @manoj..can u elaborate by making what exactly u mean...??? > > According to me if Tournament strategy is is used then i think its > ok... > > > After each round, you would have half the number that started the > previous round; except if it were an odd number it would he half + 1. > So 13 rounds. > > 2812 1 > 1406 2 > 703 3 > 352 4 > 176 5 > 88 6 > 44 7 > 22 8 > 11 9 > 6 10 > 3 11 > 2 12 > 1 13 > > > Regrads > Shashank "Don't b Evil U Can Earn while U Learn" > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > > -- -- Manoj Lalavat -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
