@Jalaj: The results depend on the "endianness" of the addressing scheme on your hardware. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endianness.) The language standard does not specify a required endianness. You must be using a little-endian hardware, but the results would be different on a big-endian system.
Dave On Feb 6, 11:03 am, jalaj jaiswal <jalaj.jaiswa...@gmail.com> wrote: > the logic is :- > int is stored in 32 bits in our systems > > 300 is 00000000 00000000 00000001 00101100 > as ptr is character pointer, it points to lower 8 bits > and when *++ptr=2 gets executed then 00000001 changes to 00000010(equal to > 2) > > so i becomes 00000000 00000000 00000010 00101100 which is 556 :D > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:26 PM, aditya pratap > <contacttoadity...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > @jalaj : gcc compiler. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > > -- > With Regards, > *Jalaj Jaiswal* (+919019947895) > Final Year Undergraduate, > IIIT ALLAHABAD -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
