Theoretically, a language is Turing-complete if it computes all partial recursive functions, ie functions that include all the basic functions and is closed under composition, primitive recursion and minimization.
Basic Functions zero () = 0 succ (x) = x +1 proj_i (x1, x2,..., xn) = xi Composition Let f1, f2, f3, fn eg partial recursive functions then h is defined by a composition iff h (x1,..., xn) = g (f1 (x1, .., xn), f2 (x1, ... , xn ),..., fn (x1,..., xn)) The notion of computability is established by Churh-Turing thesis. I believe our general computability is a very difficult task:) Wladimir Araujo Tavares *Federal University of CearĂ¡ * On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Carl Barton <odysseus.ulys...@gmail.com>wrote: > To elaborate why; if your language suffers from the halting problem then > it's pretty safe to say it's turing complete and infinite loops would allow > you to achieve that. > > > On 27 March 2011 19:03, Carl Barton <odysseus.ulys...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If you're not concerned about being that formal then having conditional >> branching statements and being able to write infinite loops would be a >> pretty good indication. >> >> >> On 27 March 2011 14:38, Karthik Jayaprakash >> <howtechstuffwo...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Thanks for replying. I am aware of that. But is there a practical >>> way of checking it???? >>> >>> On Mar 26, 7:40 pm, Carl Barton <odysseus.ulys...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > If it can simulate a universal turing machine then it is turing >>> complete >>> > >>> > On 26 March 2011 22:34, Karthik Jayaprakash < >>> howtechstuffwo...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > Is there a way to check that if a language is Turing complete????? >>> > >>> > > Thanks. >>> > >>> > > -- >>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> > > "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>> > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. >>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> > > For more options, visit this group at >>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >>> >>> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.