Theoretically, a language is Turing-complete if it computes all partial
recursive functions, ie functions that include all the basic functions and
is closed under composition, primitive recursion and minimization.

Basic Functions
zero () = 0
succ (x) = x +1
proj_i (x1, x2,..., xn) = xi

Composition
Let f1, f2, f3, fn eg partial recursive functions then h is defined by a
composition iff h (x1,..., xn) = g (f1 (x1, .., xn), f2 (x1, ... , xn ),...,
fn (x1,..., xn))

The notion of computability is established by Churh-Turing thesis. I believe
our general computability is a very difficult task:)


Wladimir Araujo Tavares
*Federal University of CearĂ¡

*




On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Carl Barton <odysseus.ulys...@gmail.com>wrote:

> To elaborate why; if your language suffers from the halting problem then
> it's pretty safe to say it's turing complete and infinite loops would allow
> you to achieve that.
>
>
> On 27 March 2011 19:03, Carl Barton <odysseus.ulys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If you're not concerned about being that formal then having conditional
>> branching statements and being able to write infinite loops would be a
>> pretty good indication.
>>
>>
>> On 27 March 2011 14:38, Karthik Jayaprakash 
>> <howtechstuffwo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>  Thanks for replying. I am aware of that. But is there a practical
>>> way of checking it????
>>>
>>> On Mar 26, 7:40 pm, Carl Barton <odysseus.ulys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > If it can simulate a universal turing machine then it is turing
>>> complete
>>> >
>>> > On 26 March 2011 22:34, Karthik Jayaprakash <
>>> howtechstuffwo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >  Is there a way to check that if a language is Turing complete?????
>>> >
>>> > > Thanks.
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>> > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to