i dont think k*k submatrix approach works at all
what if k >=n size of submatrix will be n*n, which is matrix itself
heap seems to be a good approach with a coloring scheme that helps in
avoiding duplicates in heap ??

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:18 PM, vikas <vikas.rastogi2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> @Shiva, not necessarily in upper half
>
> take the transpose of example put by Dave and see by yourself
>
> There are few observations for this question:
>    1. kth smallest will always lie in first k*k matrix
>    2. it wont be part of sqrt(k)*sqrt(k) matrix
>  Thus rest all need to be searched recursively to find the element
>
> Any suggestions ?
>
>
> On Oct 10, 10:55 am, "shiva@Algo" <shiv.jays...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > id we see the pattern then we can easily find that the kth smallest
> element
> > lie on the upper half of the k*k submatrix(on the upperleft corner )
> > we can do search on  (k*k)/2 elements to find that
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> wrote:
> > > @Shubham: So if the matrix is
> > > 1 2
> > > 3 4
> > > and you want the 2nd smallest, are you saying that it is 4?
> >
> > > Dave
> >
> > > On Oct 9, 7:40 pm, shubham goyal <shubhamgoyal.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > im assuming it be a square matrix
> > > > then kth smallest element will be in a first k*k sub matrix.
> > > > jst look for smallest element in the diagonal of this matrix.
> > > > it will give the kth smallest element .
> >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Ankur Garg <ankurga...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Given a 2D matrix which is both row wise and column wise sorted.
> > > Propose an
> > > > > algorithm for finding the kth smallest element in it in least time
> > > > > complexity
> >
> > > > > A General Max Heap can be used with k space and n+klogk complexity
> >
> > > > > Any other solution  or even a way by which we dont scan the whole
> > > matrix to
> > > > > find the solution ?
> >
> > > > > I
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Sunny Aggrawal
B.Tech. V year,CSI
Indian Institute Of Technology,Roorkee

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to