i think its just a logical reason .... take animal as superclass bird as subclass ... since we are talking about inheritance it is " is a relationship " ie bird is a animal not vice versa hence we cannot implicitly convert to subclass
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:18 PM, sulekha metta <metta.sule...@gmail.com>wrote: > Q) why super class object can't be implicitly converted to subclass? is > there any specific reason? > Thanks in advance! > > -- > sulekha metta > B.E computer science > osmania university > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
