To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64850
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 28 07:10:10 -0700 2006 ------- Okay. Let me see if I understand. You are syaing this is not a regression. Is that correct? If yes, then I would like to point out that "A regression is when the software "relapses to a less perfect or developed state". (American Heritage Dictionary) This usually means that a feature or function was working in earlier builds and is now broken. It may also mean that speed or stability has gotten worse. It's often useful to notice that something is a regression, because it may point out that a bug "fix" was actually not appropriate or proper." Now you have confirmed that 1.1.5 does indeed import the file correctly but that 2.0.2 does not yet you refuse to treat this as a REGRESSION. Why? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
