Henrik wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:37:08AM +0100, Mark Martinec wrote: >> On Wednesday January 24 2007 06:36, Gary V wrote: >> > [...], but at some point in the near future (when etch goes stable) >> > we are all going to have to move to etch in order to keep our systems >> > updated. >> >> ... or to some other OS or distribution that won't be giving you >> such headaches ... :)
Sorry, despite its quirks I would leave kicking and screaming if you tried to drag me away from Debian (but I do have a lot of respect for FreeBSD). :) > Or just forget the silly "stable" mantra, and occasionally update to the > latest and greatest. I've been doing that for years on many servers and > never got any serious problems. You probably get many more problems like > this with the stable way. > On real servers, I prefer Solaris though. ;) > Cheers, > Henrik Personally I run both but keep one mostly stable production system simply so I can relate to and be of assistance to those who insist on remaining stable (which at this particular point because of the required Convert::UUlib version is not possible). In the end a system that runs reliably is the only thing I really care about. Gary V ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
