Mark Tiramani, > Am I correct in thinking that if I completely disable bad header checks > then Amavisd-new should be able to use the SA score as it does for spam > that does not have header issues?
Header checks, even if triggered, do not prevent spam checks from running. > The reason for the question is: > I am seeing emails that are trapped with: > $final_bad_header_destiny = D_BOUNCE; > and have only the header: > X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER MIME error: ... etc. > But when the same emails are passed through SA manually they easily exceed > the spam kill score. Check the log, demonstrate that spam checks were really skipped. > I originally expected the SA checks to take priority and left the default: > $final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS; > in place. However, many of these emails are blatant spam, resulting in the > obvious user reactions. Spam results do have priority over bad headers. The order goes like: CC_VIRUS CC_BANNED CC_UNCHECKED CC_SPAM CC_SPAMMY CC_BADH CC_OVERSIZED CC_MTA CC_CLEAN I'm not sure what you are seing actually. Which version of amavisd-new? Show evidence. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
