as long as adc2 won't become a race of "the world's most bizzare apps"
i have no opinion.

the primary goal of android challenge should be more on 'usefulness',
not on perculiarity or singularity that is like firework -- users
download it and dump it in short time and the winners take rewards and
disappear from the market -- w ha t ha f ha ha !!??


On Mar 19, 10:43 pm, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:
> I see it as a better long-term prospect to include all types of apps.
>
> If you only include open-source apps then you're limiting the field, and
> even if you only include free apps it'll re-enforce users views that all
> apps should be free which would not help anyone trying to establish a
> business around Android software.
>
> I would mean that in the short term there would be some great free apps
> as people take a punt at getting revenue from a prize as opposed to
> getting revenue from sales, but, unless Google offer the prizes every
> month for the rest of Markets existance, it wouldn't help grow a
> sustainable application development community.
>
> Al.
>
>
>
> Mattaku Betsujin wrote:
> > What about only limiting to open-source apps?
>
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Ivan Soto <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> >     If my application sells for like $.99 and the top seller is
> >     selling around 600 to 1000 a month, a lot of developer would be
> >     spending $1500 just to make themselves to the top. The price would
> >     be more than that amount.
>
> >     Just a thought.
>
> >     I don't like that idea. I really prefer a challenge that favor
> >     towards the quality and user friendly capabilities.
>
> >     my 2 cents.
>
> >     Ivan Soto Fernandez
> >     Web Developer
> >    http://ivansotof.com
>
> >     On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Dan Morrill <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> >         We have considered and are considering ideas along those
> >         lines.  That is *not* to say that that's what we are going to
> >         do, so don't take it as confirmation. :)  But yes, many
> >         different structures are on the table.
>
> >         - Dan
>
> >         On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Al Sutton
> >         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> >             Dan,
>
> >             Thanks for the clarification.
>
> >             How about making the ADC II a set of awards which are
> >             given to the best
> >             selling apps in each category each month for the next
> >             couple of years.
> >             This would allow the Android user community to vote on
> >             what is good for
> >             them, give developers a reason to push their apps to the
> >             limit of what
> >             they can do, and allow Google to focus the prizes on
> >             groups delivering
> >             what people want.
>
> >             Just a thought.
>
> >             Al.
>
> >             Dan Morrill wrote:
> >             > Oops.  Looks like that page was collateral damage when
> >             we did the move
> >             > to developer.android.com <http://developer.android.com>
> >             <http://developer.android.com>.  We're
> >             > looking into it; thanks for pointing it out.  At any
> >             rate the content
> >             > that would be there refers only to the first Developer
> >             Challenge.
>
> >             > Regarding the second Developer Challenge, it definitely
> >             isn't canceled
> >             > but we haven't announced plans for it yet.  We said we
> >             would by last
> >             > year (sorry about that), but we're still working on how
> >             to structure
> >             > it.  The world is quite a bit different now than it was
> >             when we ran
> >             > the first ADC, so we want to make sure the new
> >             rules/structure make
> >             > sense, and we are of course taking into consideration
> >             everyone's
> >             > experiences with the first ADC.  The second ADC will
> >             definitely not be
> >             > a clone of the first ADC.
>
> >             > We expect to have all this finalized and announce rules
> >             within a
> >             > couple months.  The event itself will likely run in the
> >             second half of
> >             > the year.
>
> >             > - Dan
>
> >             > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Al Sutton
> >             <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >             > <mailto:[email protected]
> >             <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
> >             >     Very very recently though. Googling for "android
> >             developer challenge"
> >             >     still brings up the 404ed page as the top result.
>
> >             >     Al.
>
> >             >     Anonymous Anonymous wrote:
> >             >     >http://developer.android.com/
> >             >     > try in here.. its moved i guess
>
> >             >     > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Eelke Folmer
> >             >     <[email protected]
> >             <mailto:[email protected]>
> >             <mailto:[email protected]
> >             <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >             >     > <mailto:[email protected]
> >             <mailto:[email protected]>
> >             <mailto:[email protected]
> >             <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
> >             >     wrote:
>
> >             >     >     This (http://code.google.com/android/adc.html
> >             )  gives a
> >             >     404 which is
> >             >     >     weird for a google site.
> >             >     >     Is this challenge cancelled? I hope not......
>
> >             >     --
>
> >             >     * Written an Android App? - List it at
> >            http://andappstore.com/*
>
> >             >     ======
> >             >     Funky Android Limited is registered in England &
> >             Wales with the
> >             >     company number  6741909. The registered head office
> >             is Kemp House,
> >             >     152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> >             >     The views expressed in this email are those of the
> >             author and not
> >             >     necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's
> >             associates, or it's
> >             >     subsidiaries.
>
> >             --
>
> >             * Written an Android App? - List it at
> >            http://andappstore.com/*
>
> >             ======
> >             Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales
> >             with the
> >             company number  6741909. The registered head office is
> >             Kemp House,
> >             152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> >             The views expressed in this email are those of the author
> >             and not
> >             necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's
> >             associates, or it's
> >             subsidiaries.
>
> --
>
> * Written an Android App? - List it athttp://andappstore.com/*
>
> ======
> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> subsidiaries.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to