Thank you Brian for the review: I agree with you about the improved quality and 
good to know about your implementation

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, 8 April 2020 at 04:15
To: "last-c...@ietf.org" <last-c...@ietf.org>
Cc: "anima-cha...@ietf.org" <anima-cha...@ietf.org>, Eric Vyncke 
<evyn...@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-pl...@ietf.org" 
<draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-pl...@ietf.org>, "anima@ietf.org" 
<anima@ietf.org>, "jiangsh...@huawei.com" <jiangsh...@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Last Call: 
<draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24.txt> (An Autonomic Control Plane 
(ACP)) to Proposed Standard

    I have looked carefully at the diffs since the previous Last Call for this 
document and I believe that they all represent improvements. Obviously it's a 
very complex document and I have no doubt there will be future changes in the 
light of experience, but from my point of view it meets the requirements for a 
Proposed Standard (assuming normal copy-editing).
    
    Specifically I've checked the parts that concern GRASP, as an author of the 
approved draft-ietf-anima-grasp-15, and they are correct in my opinion. In 
particular, I coded a demonstration of the two GRASP objectives defined in this 
draft a couple of years ago, showing that those definitions were correct and 
implementable. I have retested this demo today. Code at:
    https://github.com/becarpenter/graspy/blob/master/ACPcontainer.py
    https://github.com/becarpenter/graspy/blob/master/ACPnewby.py
    
    Regards
       Brian Carpenter
    
    On 08-Apr-20 01:34, The IESG wrote:
    > 
    > The IESG has received a request from the Autonomic Networking Integrated
    > Model and Approach WG (anima) to consider the following document: - 'An
    > Autonomic Control Plane (ACP)'
    >   <draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane-24.txt> as Proposed Standard
    > 
    > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits 
final
    > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
    > last-c...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2020-04-21. Exceptionally, comments 
may
    > be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the 
beginning
    > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
    > 
    > Abstract
    > 
    > 
    >    Autonomic functions need a control plane to communicate, which
    >    depends on some addressing and routing.  This Autonomic Control Plane
    >    should ideally be self-managing, and as independent as possible of
    >    configuration.  This document defines such a plane and calls it the
    >    "Autonomic Control Plane", with the primary use as a control plane
    >    for autonomic functions.  It also serves as a "virtual out-of-band
    >    channel" for Operations, Administration and Management (OAM)
    >    communications over a network that provides automatically configured
    >    hop-by-hop authenticated and encrypted communications via
    >    automatically configured IPv6 even when the network is not
    >    configured, or misconfigured.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > The file can be obtained via
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane/
    > 
    > IESG discussion can be tracked via
    > 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-autonomic-control-plane/ballot/
    > 
    > The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:
    > 
    >    https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2407/
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Anima mailing list
    > Anima@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
    > 
    

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to