On Sun, 04 May 2008 16:10:31 -0700, pyther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sonntag, 4. Mai 2008 12:47 Tino Reichardt wrote:
> If they don't have the time to be a maintainer for some package, they
> shouldn't be the maintainer of it!
For me this is definitely too hard. And unfair because archlinux is a
distribution (as a lot of other too) which is managed by private
individual
for private individual.
The devs of archlinux gives us with abs a perfect and easy
understandable way
to make in the most cases updates at the time we wants it. Irony on:
That is
why other distros with another package magagment needs fulltime
maintaining.-)
And to the argument of that clamav is a "security update": This is only
relevant for servers which have windows clients and in this case,
sorry, this
is at first the job of the admin of the server and "opps" this be you
and not
the maintainer of a package.
It isn't to hard. Its just the plain truth.
If the maintainer hasn't the time, he should give the package to someone
else, which has the time.
PS: I am not an admin of some important server which needs an update ;)
--
regards, TR
What if there are no other devs/maintainer? Maintainers have to be
trusted, have to prove that they know what their
doing etc...
I wouldn't want someone random person from the community becoming a
maintainer for a package or two, because you don't
know what he or she knows. I wouldn't want to install a pkg that wipes
out my whole /usr dir by mistake.
Also if security is a big concern arch isn't probably the best distro to
be using.
This is my criticism in the Archlinux Leadership. I think there must some
changes, I will not shot Aaron, I mean Aaron needs some help in form from
a Lead Engineer for "community/AUR" and for "development" how can
organize this. Many User like to help but can't because the developer
sitting like a chicken on his eggs (packages), with no response. Now I
will spam this topic here, http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=48092
