On 2014-04-18 01:20, Karol Babioch wrote: > ...snip... > Personally I like this approach the most. Obviously it has drawbacks in > multi-user environments. But it won't lead to conflicts, because pacman > doesn't know anything about it and to be quite honest most of us are the > only user on a system anyway. > > However, I kind of like the proposed idea of an empty "meta package", > that will only trigger the installation of dependencies. Is this > something you would be interested in? > > Best regards, > Karol Babioch >
I actually use the meta-package approach to handle dependencies for wine-based and steam-based games, so I wouldn't mind (I hate marking dependencies as explicitly installed, so that's a second reason to do that). I'm curious if those are acceptable in the AUR. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
pgpvLQkjBDSlf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
