Hi Adam I thought I'd deleted this post because after writing it I realised that my RDM problem is a little different! I thought this was probably a documentation problem only, thank you for looking into it and confirming it.
My RDM problem is this: I am only using the RDM to change the authority files because I am a user and we don't have a full time IT staff member assigned to our project yet so can't change the files directly. I used the sample files as a basis and added our concepts for the heritage resource type and deleted the sample ones. I did the same for the resource classification types. I then added the appropriate concepts to the drop down lists for each. When I tried inputting a resource, I found that the resource classification drop down list was where I expected the heritage resource list and vice versa. The concepts were the ones I had input. I cannot give you copies of the files but I took screen shots of the problem and can upload them tomorrow when I am back at work. But I checked and double checked that I had input the concepts in the correct places. Have you come across this problem before? Lucy Sent from my iPad > On 27 Oct 2015, at 19:07, Adam Cox <mr.adam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > HI Lucy, I looked into this, and saw the same thing in the documentation. I > went back to the HIP resource graphs and pulled new tables for the > documentation straight from them. Looks like it was a typo in the > documentation, because the graphs don't seem to have the mix up > (documentation should be fixed now). > > If you are finding a problem in the RDM, could you post more information > about it? > > Thanks for pointing out the issue, > Adam > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Lucy FJ <luc...@aucegypt.edu> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have been successfully inputting our own authority files through the RDM >> but then came across a strange problem: the heritage group type seems to be >> confused with the heritage resource type. On checking the documentation, the >> appendices showing each resource graph, I found the same thing: >> Under the graph: Heritage Resource E18, exists >> Heritage_Resource_group_Type_Authority Document.E32 but under the graph: >> Heritage Resource Group. E27 exists >> Heritage_Resource_Type_Authority_Document.E32 >> >> Surely these should be the other way round? Is the documentation confused, >> the actual installation confused or am I confused? >> >> Many thanks for your help, >> >> Lucy >> -- >> -- To post, send email to archesproject@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe, >> send email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more >> information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Arches Project" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- To post, send email to archesproject@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe, send email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
