Hi Vinod,

Using the archives we could successfully skip the human tasks.

Thanks a lot for quickly responding to this.

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Vinod Kavinda <vi...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Please find the updated archives.
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Vinod Kavinda <vi...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Harsha,
>> Noted.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vinod
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Harsha Thirimanna <hars...@wso2.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vinod,
>>> Thanks for doing this again and
>>> When you do this, please add the role as we did now and add an user that
>>> is reading from the request. Then there will be a role to add any user to
>>> get this rights except the user who initiated the request.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Harsha Thirimanna*
>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
>>> *email: **hars...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>* cell: +94 71 5186770 *
>>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/ <http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>*
>>> *harshathirimannlinked-in: **http:
>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>**//www.linkedin.com/pub/harsha-thirimanna/10/ab8/122
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/harsha-thirimanna/10/ab8/122>*
>>>
>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Vinod Kavinda <vi...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Chamila,
>>>> I'll send the updated human task and bpel archives ASAP.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Chamila Wijayarathna <cham...@wso2.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Vinod,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have changed the request sent when a new workflow request is created
>>>>> by adding logged in user's name as follows.
>>>>>
>>>>> <p:ProcessRequest xmlns:p="
>>>>> http://schema.bpel.mgt.workflow.carbon.wso2.org/";>
>>>>>   <p:uuid>c90be0a4-6c1a-4bc1-960a-c5f3ed97d001</p:uuid>
>>>>>   <p:eventType>ADD_USER</p:eventType>
>>>>>   <p:taskInitiator>admin</p:taskInitiator>
>>>>>   <p:parameters><p:parameter name="REQUEST
>>>>> ID"><p:value><p:itemValue>4d79d641-b8f0-400d-86f8-c5ccd192249b</p:itemValue></p:value></p:parameter><p:parameter
>>>>> name="Username"><p:value><p:itemValue>test50</p:itemValue></p:value></p:parameter><p:parameter
>>>>> name="User Store
>>>>> Domain"><p:value><p:itemValue>PRIMARY</p:itemValue></p:value></p:parameter><p:parameter
>>>>> name="Roles"><p:value/></p:parameter><p:parameter
>>>>> name="Claims"><p:value/></p:parameter></p:parameters>
>>>>>   < p:configuration>
>>>>>     <p:approvalStep>
>>>>>         <p:stepName>Step 1</p:stepName>
>>>>>         <p:humanTask>
>>>>>           <p:humanTaskSubject></p:humanTaskSubject>
>>>>>           <p:humanTaskDescription></p:humanTaskDescription>
>>>>>         </p:humanTask>
>>>>>         <p:role>admin</p:role>
>>>>>     </p:approvalStep>
>>>>>   </p:configuration>
>>>>> </p:ProcessRequest>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please advice with necessary changes needed to be done at bpel
>>>>> and humantask side?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Hasitha Aravinda <hasi...@wso2.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Chamila,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please find my answers inline.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Chamila Wijayarathna <
>>>>>> cham...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Harsha/Hasitha,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So when creating a request, we are assigning the user who initiated
>>>>>>> it as the taskInitiator for human tasks associated with it. If so I
>>>>>>> need to clarify following points regarding that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    - Is the 'taskInitiator' per ht role/property?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Task initiator ​Configuration will look like this. ​
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​<htd:taskInitiator>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   <htd:from>...</htd:from>
>>>>>> </htd:taskInitiator>​
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    - What are the other privileges user get when he assigned as
>>>>>>>    taskInitiator other than deleting that ht?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ​Please refer Operation Authorization table in
>>>>>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/bpel4people/ws-humantask-1.1-spec-cs-01.html#_Toc261430341
>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Harsha Thirimanna <hars...@wso2.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I discussed this with Hasitha, and above approach is possible.
>>>>>>>> There is one change should be done that use taskInitiator instead of 
>>>>>>>> businessAdministrators
>>>>>>>> because businessAdministrators has more permission than we expect.
>>>>>>>> Then we can call 'skip' operation against taskid to exit the
>>>>>>>> workflow request (*HumanTaskClientAPIAdmin*). After we exit from
>>>>>>>> the human task, it should be release the bpel process and to do that we
>>>>>>>> have to enable TaskCoordinationEnabled option
>>>>>>>> in b4p-coordination-config.xml and humantask.xml files.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Chamila, We need to prepare bpel/ht package  for this and call
>>>>>>>> *HumanTaskClientAPIAdmin* from the IS to skip the workflow
>>>>>>>> request.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Harsha Thirimanna*
>>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
>>>>>>>> *email: **hars...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>* cell: +94 71
>>>>>>>> 5186770 *
>>>>>>>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/ <http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>*
>>>>>>>> *harshathirimannlinked-in: **http:
>>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>**//www.linkedin.com/pub/harsha-thirimanna/10/ab8/122
>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/harsha-thirimanna/10/ab8/122>*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Harsha Thirimanna <
>>>>>>>> hars...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> adding Hasitha
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Harsha Thirimanna*
>>>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
>>>>>>>>> *email: **hars...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>* cell: +94 71
>>>>>>>>> 5186770 *
>>>>>>>>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/ <http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>*
>>>>>>>>> *harshathirimannlinked-in: **http:
>>>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>**//www.linkedin.com/pub/harsha-thirimanna/10/ab8/122
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/harsha-thirimanna/10/ab8/122>*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Harsha Thirimanna <
>>>>>>>>> hars...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Prabath,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I went through this and as you said it should be possible to
>>>>>>>>>> suspend the workflow request by the one who initiate the request 
>>>>>>>>>> (Not the
>>>>>>>>>> one who create the workflow). According to the existing human task
>>>>>>>>>> definition we can't do that. But as I feel it is not the  limitation 
>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>> BPS.
>>>>>>>>>> It is possible to do that with reading user name within the human
>>>>>>>>>> task definition in run-time. To do that, what I did was, I pass user 
>>>>>>>>>> name
>>>>>>>>>> as parameter with the workflow request and set it to the human task 
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> element value. Then it is possible to suspend the workflow request 
>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>> initiate that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Nandika, is this correct approach to do that ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] peopleAssignments -> businessAdministrators
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Harsha Thirimanna*
>>>>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>>>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
>>>>>>>>>> *email: **hars...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>* cell: +94 71
>>>>>>>>>> 5186770 *
>>>>>>>>>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/
>>>>>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>*
>>>>>>>>>> *harshathirimannlinked-in: **http:
>>>>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>**//www.linkedin.com/pub/harsha-thirimanna/10/ab8/122
>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/harsha-thirimanna/10/ab8/122>*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Chamila Wijayarathna <
>>>>>>>>>> cham...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Prabath,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes currently only the user who initiated workflow can delete
>>>>>>>>>>> it. In human tasks side we have a different role per each workflow 
>>>>>>>>>>> who has
>>>>>>>>>>> authority to delete a human task. But we can't give permission for 
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> role to delete a request since there can be several workflows 
>>>>>>>>>>> associated to
>>>>>>>>>>> single requests. In that case where 'user1' try to delete a request
>>>>>>>>>>> associated with two human tasks, he may have permission to delete 
>>>>>>>>>>> only one
>>>>>>>>>>> human task.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank You!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Prabath Siriwardena <
>>>>>>>>>>> prab...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess the question here is related to deleting a workflow
>>>>>>>>>>>> request itself - and as if I understood correctly from your 
>>>>>>>>>>>> description at
>>>>>>>>>>>> the moment its user based. Only the user who initiate the workflow 
>>>>>>>>>>>> request
>>>>>>>>>>>> can delete it ? This looks like a limitation.. Nandika/Chathura, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT..?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Prabath
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Chamila Wijayarathna <
>>>>>>>>>>>> cham...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Prabath/Pulasthi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently we are having some confusion about how to address
>>>>>>>>>>>>> $subject.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we support delete request operation and only the user
>>>>>>>>>>>>> who initiated the request can delete it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example let's assume we have a worflow associated with add
>>>>>>>>>>>>> user operation. Then if a user called 'admin' add a new user to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> userstore 'user1'. Since a  workflow is associated with this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation user
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will not directly added to the user store until the request get 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> accepted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the user who initiated the request, in this case 'admin' can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> delete
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (abort) the request if he needed before the human tasks 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated to it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> get approved/rejected.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now how we handle this as follows. We keep a 'STATUS'
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attribute with each request (here request means 'add user1 to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> user store,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc) and when user delete request we move the 'PENDING' request to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'DELETED' state. This doesn't do any change at human task engine 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Associated human task will still be available there and relevant
>>>>>>>>>>>>> authorities can still approve/disapprove them. When the task get 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at call back we check if request has deleted and if deleted we 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignore the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> callback received.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The issue of this approach is for a deleted request, human
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks associated with it at BPEL side is still available there 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> person who approve/reject it don't get any clue of that request 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deleted. Once task is approved, we only show a console info that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'approved/rejected request has been deleted'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To address this [1] has reported that associated human tasks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be deleted when request is deleted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following is the approach that we can use to do this. When we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> delete request, we send request id as parameter. But at IS side 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep details of human tasks associated with a request since Human 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Task
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engine does not support such thing. So we can extract all the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>>>>>> human tasks and check each and every tasks parameters (each human 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> task has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> parameters such as operation type i.e. ADD_USER, ADD_ROLE, etc 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and other
>>>>>>>>>>>>> details related to it for example for a add user operation 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> username, roles,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> claims, etc) with parameters we saved with request and request to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> delete
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks. Even though this is inefficient AFAIU this is the only way 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> address this with out changing the BPEL and Human task APIs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also when creating a workflow for example 'workflow1' a role
>>>>>>>>>>>>> named 'Internal/workflow1' is created and only this role can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> delete a human
>>>>>>>>>>>>> task related to that workflow. So for a user who wants to delete 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a request
>>>>>>>>>>>>> he initiated,he may not have the permission to delete the workflow
>>>>>>>>>>>>> associated with it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So how should we address above scenario? Please advice on how
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to proceed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank You!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY-3552
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Chamila Dilshan Wijayarathna,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile:(+94)788193620
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Prabath
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @prabath
>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/prabathsiriwardena
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile : +1 650 625 7950
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.facilelogin.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.api-security.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> *Chamila Dilshan Wijayarathna,*
>>>>>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile:(+94)788193620
>>>>>>>>>>> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> *Chamila Dilshan Wijayarathna,*
>>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>>> Mobile:(+94)788193620
>>>>>>> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​Thanks,
>>>>>> Hasitha​
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Hasitha Aravinda,
>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer,
>>>>>> WSO2 Inc.
>>>>>> Email: hasi...@wso2.com
>>>>>> Mobile : +1 201 887 1971, +94 718 210 200
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Chamila Dilshan Wijayarathna,*
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>> Mobile:(+94)788193620
>>>>> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Vinod Kavinda
>>>> Software Engineer
>>>> *WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware <http://www.wso2.com>.*
>>>> Mobile : +94 (0) 712 415544
>>>> Blog : http://soatechflicks.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vinod Kavinda
>> Software Engineer
>> *WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware <http://www.wso2.com>.*
>> Mobile : +94 (0) 712 415544
>> Blog : http://soatechflicks.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Vinod Kavinda
> Software Engineer
> *WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware <http://www.wso2.com>.*
> Mobile : +94 (0) 712 415544
> Blog : http://soatechflicks.blogspot.com/
>
>


-- 
*Chamila Dilshan Wijayarathna,*
Software Engineer
Mobile:(+94)788193620
WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com/
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to