thanks for the asking the question i was hoping would be asked. It allows this topic to be brought up without hearing, 'the election's over..why is this still a topic?'
I, for one, might consider suing (if i was a person of litigious nature) because they seem to have been negligent in making sure that the developer's agreement is being held to as intended. If the city was on top of making sure restoration and safety came first (and maybe question these anti-newtonian timlines the MD has seemed to concocted) the casino would certainly be in better shape by now. And frankly, if they gave a crap, they would MAKE as sure that people wouldn't be walking through that death trap as well as they seem to be making sure people arent hitting the sand without beach badges. I think having the casino open is an important part of generating BW traffic (people certainly arent going to hop in their car and to come from the south if they are at the beach in OG, but will readily continue their stroll northward through the casino), and hate the fact that it is closed, but the reality is that someone has to intercede to make sure the injury and litigation does not ensue. The last thing AP needs is the setback of bad press related to the perception that 'camden by the sea' is still an appropriate euphemism for AP. Tony --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, charlie leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Sure there are 'debris nets' but how long before > someone gets hit with something and the city is > sueded?" > > the city doesnt own the casino, so why would the city > get sued? > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
