--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since there is very little difference between the March and June > proposals, this will all be over quickly. > > The DEP will re-review the portions of the March proposal that are > different than the June proposal. There will be a public input > period. Then the DEP will rule, and I'm predicting they rule in favor > of the 10 and 16 story C8 building. > > That's really all there is to it. Doesn't seem to amount to a hill of > beans in the long run. > Not the point and you know it. The point is assuming that the plan does not allow rebuilding if demolished, then an amendment would be needed. Something (whether tangible or intangible) could be received in return. But what did occur is that Aaron says that the June version, which is explicit, is not what was adopted and the one that was, March version, doesn't say that. Of course it also says that. Aaron is a cheerleader for the developer. You cannot admit that publically Tom, I understand that. I will not judge you for it as long as you do not defend what was done. But if you defned it, then I have to criticize you for knowing what side yur bread is buttered on.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
