--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe there has to be a public input period by law. There never > was any on the March proposal (at least on the terms that are different > than the June proposal).
But there was public hearings and planning board review which were submitted to he city on April 26 and which ultimately led to the adoption. Unless you meant to say it the other way around (differences between June and March), but that would assume that DEP keeps the June and the city adopts it. No, I assume that that what the city contends is the plan will be substituted for what DEP has. Since the city contends that already went for review, none else may be needed. That is why I assume Aaron contends the June version could not be the plan. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
