At 2:16 PM +0000 2/5/06, dfsavgny wrote:
>...Joe, I think Maureen was being tongue-in-cheek on that post. You were
>not the only one complaining. I did several times to her during the
>show, right afterwards and the next morning and day. Maureen never led
>me to believe that she didn't believe the complaints were valid, in
>fact, she was immediately concerned about it. Her post was obviously
>an attempt at humor that was mispinterpreted.
That's why e-mail that might be misinterpreted should carry a disclaimer.
Smilies usually suffice ;-).
Without the disclaimer, one can only read the words for what they are.
Besides... the message from Maureen ended up in my "inbox" before I also read
it on the Asbury Park yahoo group. Since I had been in communication with both
Maureen and Pete Walton over the quality of the audio (both over-the-internet
and later-on-line) this looked like a personal reply. What should I have
thought? While she never indicated that the complaints -- and I'd characterize
my communications as recommendations and not complaints -- were not valid, she
in as much said they were by her use of the word "perceived".
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
