--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Woah, now there's a stretch, that local land use law is irrelevent. > Local land use law and zoning are the defacto regulations for land > development and cannot be changed except by appropriate process of the > municipality. > > Your suggesting that I could force the operation of that hog farm of > mine on the property I purchased from you through the action of a > bankruptcy filing in spite of the zoning being residential. > > Not a hogs chance in H-ll of that happening. > You are failing to see the essence here. Local land use is irrelevant in that it is immaterial to the Court. It does not and will not try to affect local land use. Whatever the contract is worth is the Court's discretion to administer. Certainly, Carabetta's rights were seen as being worth something which were being fought over by the creditor's. The Court was silent as to what could be developed but it was in its jurisdiction to attempt to get as much for the creditors as it could. If that meant squeezing the City, so be it (to the Court). It is the City's fault that the rights even entered the court as an asset or did not prove that they did not have value. Again, the city's advisors, Aaron. All roads lead to Rome.
Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/