The opinion maker, unfortunately, is the Abury Park Press. They
couldn't wrap their heads around the idea that the default in this
limited situation was good not bad.
You think they'll take the time to sort out the nuances of what you
point out below? Once they hear the 2002 plan is no longer, they won't
simply explain we have the 91 plan. They'll treat it like a nuke went
of in the middle of Asbury and every bank and investor will run for
cover.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <bluebishop82@>
> wrote:
> >
> > If all that happends, do you know what will happen to AP? I'll be
> > able to buy Pat Fasano's $1.3 million house for $150K again.
>
> Explain please. Are you saying if Partners won't negotiate or having
> the 1991 plan, or both? Having the 1991 plan simply means you can
then
> negotiate a new plan. Partners won't want to stick that plan. You
> suggest then that we are held hostage to Partners?
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
