Why is TS focusing so much on JK?
Shouldn't the major issue of the moment be moving AP in a better direction, 
fighting 
crime, getting the redevelopment under control and paying attention to the west 
side...not 
just the east?

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So you really are making the case that Jim Keady is right and the 
> rest of the City is wrong.
> 
> Says alot.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <dfsavgny@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
> > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Seems like the people upset with Jim is getting to be a pretty 
> > > diverse group.  Can they all be wrong?
> > > 
> > > Any thought at all that maybe he isn't conducting himself very 
> > well?
> > 
> > 
> > Glad you asked. Firstly, I read the article. Seems like he is in 
> the 
> > clear and had permission. If the schools did not internally follow 
> > protocol, well.....
> > 
> > Greater "wrongs" have been done by public officials in AP and 
> there 
> > has been NO outcry from anyone except the appointed "naysayers." 
> > Groups like the UEZ, etc., have remained mute while councilmembers 
> > have lied in print and public meetings. Said nothing while 
> accepted 
> > redevelopment plans were ignored and voided. I could go on. All 
> who 
> > drink at the trough of City Hall put their hands over their 
> > collective mouths, eyes and ears because it was deemed 
> the "greater 
> > good" by their masters.
> > 
> > Don't think I do not know how far the influence of Loffredo and 
> > Bruno goes in this city. You yourself don't say what you know is 
> > wrong in public because of it, although you have said it at times 
> in 
> > private (BTW, I expect your GUMBA article to be here today if not 
> in 
> > TCN).
> > 
> > Keady was considered a great guy by many as he spoke against 
> eminent 
> > domain, tried to save buildings and to get Partners to move their 
> > asses.
> > 
> > What went wrong? Well, he started to speak about serving the poor, 
> > the downtrodden. The claims against Keady have been posted right 
> > here all along. A diverse group - those against him politically - 
> > and others, such as those with real estate interests - brokers, 
> > agents, owners, etc., join opinion with you that he will make this 
> > city nothing but soup kitchens and homeless shelters if he had his 
> > way. Weren't those your words?
> > 
> > That is his crime. The fear is that he will keep this town down 
> and 
> > reduce our property values. Didn't Allan come right out and say 
> that?
> > 
> > And so, you get people who have influence on official boards to 
> join 
> > the fray. Doesn't matter what the facts are, as along as there is 
> an 
> > opportunity to criticize him. It is clear that the powers that be, 
> > both inside and outside of City Hall, want Keady gone.
> > 
> > Keady's announcement of what he is doing in his official capacity 
> is 
> > interpreted as "grandstanding" instead of being accepted as it is 
> > given - fulfilling his obligation to keep his constituents 
> apprised.
> > 
> > He is proactive. Thank God. The group that has mobilized against 
> him 
> > are a bunch of cheerleaders. Everything is show,parades, 
> fireworks, 
> > faux landings of lost explorers,etc. Tom, next Columbus Day take 
> > your show to Howell. Let yourkids participate there where they 
> live 
> > and go to school.
> > 
> > I won't criticize the School Board because I don't know everything 
> > and I know there are good people in it. But reading about events 
> > over the past few years and the ongoing performance of the 
> schools, 
> > I would say that Bob DiSanto and the board have their hands full. 
> > There is plenty of blame to go around concerning the schools. They 
> > should be addressing more important matters than Keady visiting 
> the 
> > school. It all seems a bit heavy-handed and a coincidence on the 
> > heels of the UEZ letter.
> > 
> > I would say that all of our councilman and mayor, and city 
> manager, 
> > should have considered visiting the school in the wake of the 
> > shootings. But I don't think I would want Bruno talking to my kids.
> > 
> > It is time for people to wake up. Keady is not going to do 
> anything 
> > to reduce our property values. They are more in danger of 
> declining 
> > due to the potential failure of the redevelopment and Partners 
> > continual postponement of the waterfront restoration.
> > 
> > A lot of people (real estate people) made a lot of money in this 
> > town over the past few years. I see their hand in this. Shame on 
> you 
> > all.
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to