Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],


In reference to your comment:

You're the one that posted that stuff about JK cursing here (why don't you reprint your apology to JK for doing that).
 
See message 18874  "My apology to Keady and his response."
 
 
I only told you after you emailed me 10 times as Jim's supporter. I was hoping to get you to stop stalking me.
 
See message # 18836 "Private emails..."  and  message  #18838  "To be Fair and Balanced."  Especially my explanation that I was not a Keady supporter.  Further there were 6 emails from me (about politics, Marxism, Zinn et al.) from responding to those initiated by you. 
 
That proves my point from earlier: You "wanted to help" Jim Keady but your actions hurt him. Wanting to help is irrelevant. We all want to help.
 
All of the above proves what I've thought all along:  You don't read and consider what others say; you simply react, and to things which weren't said.
 
All heat; no light.
 

========Original Message========
Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
Date: 11/9/2006 2:08:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent on:   

You're the one that posted that stuff about JK cursing here (why
don't you reprint your apology to JK for doing that).

I only told you after you emailed me 10 times as Jim's supporter. I
was hoping to get you to stop stalking me.

Since you were his supporter, I never dreamed you would put it on
the 'net. I figured you were in his camp.

You were so blinded in your desire to hurt me you hurt him.

That proves my point from earlier: You "wanted to help" Jim Keady
but your actions hurt him. Wanting to help is irrelevant. We all
want to help.

You two should start a "Good intentions/bad results" club.

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]. wrote:
>
>
> Hello justifiedright@...,
> In reference to your half-truths:
> :
>
>
> When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc.
and
> the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.
>
>
> Then Keady apologized to you:
>
>
>
> Hello james.keady@...,
> In reference to your comment:
>
>
> Tom,
> I am writing to apologize for some of the comments and language
that I used
> during our telephone conversation last night. Regardless of how
I felt, they
> have no place in honest discourse. I hope that you accept my
apology and
> that we move forward in a spirit of continued dialogue.
>
>
>
> And you responded on October 10:
>
>
>
> Hello james.keady@...,
> In reference to your comment:
>
>
> Jim you don't have to apologize to me. We are two
fairly "regular" guys.
> Our conversations are going to be a little salty sometimes.
That's never
> going to be shared with anyone or ever held against you. I'm glad
you feel
> comfortable enough with me to speak to me like a regular guy.
>
>
> :
>
> So your word is is good huh?
>
>
>
> ========Original Message========
> Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog Date: 11/9/2006 11:42:02
A.M. Eastern
> Standard Time From: _justifiedright@..._
> (mailto:justifiedri[EMAIL PROTECTED]) To: _AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
> Sent on:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jack I tried talking to him. He called my house repeatedly. He
> sent me an email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I
was
> busy at the moment).
>
> When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me names, etc.
and
> the next day his wife emailed me and called me names.
>
> You suggest to me this is a guy open to discussion?
>
> It isn't because of me he is losing the faith of so many. It's
> because of how he treats people.
>
> --- In _AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com) ,
> "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> >
> > The agenda seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read
> here, it existed before
> > the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a way to
> get him out of there.
> > One thing is really bothering me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady
> actually going to him
> > directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they
have
> issue with. JK seems
> > pretty open to discussion. Why not discuss?
> > --- In _AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com) ,
> Allan Peterson <nnjallans1@>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > please define the agenda?
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: Hinge <hinge98@>
> > > To: _AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM
> > > Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
> > >
> > > Well said, and I don't understand why some of the others here
> aren't taking that into
> > account.
> > > To me, the slamming of JK was already waiting in the wings,
and
> his detractors used the
> > > whole shooting mess to push their agenda.
> > >
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro"
<njdave@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that
> > > > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the
> problems faced
> > > > by Asbury Park.
> > > >
> > > > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury
Park.
> He is
> > > > trying to give the kids a feeling of worth, and a voice.
> > > >
> > > > How better to let the kids know that the adults care about
> them and
> > > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If the
> kids
> > > > develop a feeling of self worth and self respect... who
knows
> how
> > > > Asbury can benefit?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________________
> _______________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> > > _http://new.mail.http://ne_ (http://new.mail.yahoo.com/)
> > >
> >
>

__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Asbury park nj real estate United state flag Asbury park nj
Asbury park real estate United state travel

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to