You're the one that posted that stuff about JK cursing here (why
don't
you reprint your apology to JK for doing that).
I only told you after you
emailed me 10 times as Jim's supporter. I
was hoping to get you to stop
stalking me.
Since you were his supporter, I never dreamed you would put
it on
the 'net. I figured you were in his camp.
You were so blinded
in your desire to hurt me you hurt him.
That proves my point from
earlier: You "wanted to help" Jim Keady
but your actions hurt him. Wanting
to help is irrelevant. We all
want to help.
You two should start a
"Good intentions/bad results" club.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. wrote:
>
>
> Hello
justifiedright@...,
> In reference to your half-truths:
> :
>
>
> When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called me
names, etc.
and
> the next day his wife emailed me and called me
names.
>
>
> Then Keady apologized to you:
>
>
>
> Hello james.keady@...,
> In reference to your
comment:
>
>
> Tom,
> I am writing to apologize for
some of the comments and language
that I used
> during our telephone
conversation last night. Regardless of how
I felt, they
> have no
place in honest discourse. I hope that you accept my
apology and
>
that we move forward in a spirit of continued dialogue.
>
>
>
> And you responded on October 10:
>
>
>
> Hello james.keady@...,
> In reference to your comment:
>
>
> Jim you don't have to apologize to me. We are two
fairly "regular" guys.
> Our conversations are going to be a little
salty sometimes.
That's never
> going to be shared with anyone or
ever held against you. I'm glad
you feel
> comfortable enough with me
to speak to me like a regular guy.
>
>
> :
>
>
So your word is is good huh?
>
>
>
> ========Original
Message========
> Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog Date: 11/9/2006
11:42:02
A.M. Eastern
> Standard Time From: _justifiedright@..._
> (mailto:justifiedri[EMAIL PROTECTED]) To: _AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
> Sent on:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Jack I tried talking to him. He called my house repeatedly. He
> sent me
an email accusing me of ducking his calls (sorry but I
was
> busy at
the moment).
>
> When I called him back he dropped F-Bombs, called
me names, etc.
and
> the next day his wife emailed me and called me
names.
>
> You suggest to me this is a guy open to
discussion?
>
> It isn't because of me he is losing the faith of so
many. It's
> because of how he treats people.
>
> --- In
_AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
,
> "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> >
> > The agenda
seems to be bias against JK, and from what i've read
> here, it existed
before
> > the shooting...so maybe they are using the shooting as a
way to
> get him out of there.
> > One thing is really bothering
me. Is anybody who is anti-Keady
> actually going to him
> >
directly to ask about the gang comment, or anything else they
have
>
issue with. JK seems
> > pretty open to discussion. Why not
discuss?
> > --- In _AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
,
> Allan Peterson <nnjallans1@>
> wrote:
> >
>
> > > please define the agenda?
> > >
> >
>
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From:
Hinge <hinge98@>
> > > To: _AsburyPark@yahoogroAsburyP_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com)
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2006 9:51:10 AM
> > >
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Keady Blog
> > >
> > > Well
said, and I don't understand why some of the others here
> aren't taking
that into
> > account.
> > > To me, the slamming of JK
was already waiting in the wings,
and
> his detractors used the
> > > whole shooting mess to push their agenda.
> > >
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "theshortsalepro"
<njdave@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> I think I read Keady said, and I'm paraphrasing here, that
> >
> > children/youth/ students are part of the solution to the
>
problems faced
> > > > by Asbury Park.
> > > >
> > > > He is trying to involve the kids in the future of Asbury
Park.
> He is
> > > > trying to give the kids a
feeling of worth, and a voice.
> > > >
> > > >
How better to let the kids know that the adults care about
> them and
> > > > their opinions (read: respect) than to tell 'em so? If
the
> kids
> > > > develop a feeling of self worth and
self respect... who
knows
> how
> > > > Asbury can
benefit?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
__________________________________________________________
>
_______________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Everyone
is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> > > _http://new.mail.http://ne_ (http://new.mail.yahoo.com/)
>
> >
> >
>