Well, you may have a point there.
But trying to save Asbury isn't a crime, and he seems to be a pretty humble guy
in my
opinion. I sincerely doubt his is look for personal gains by wanting all the
credit.
Hey, are we ever going to discuss anything else here besides Jim Keady. This is
getting to
be a bit boring.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> >
> >
>
> Because something like that should be dicussed and researched. It's s
> knee-jerk re-action. Jim Keady is like a goalie in soccer he stands
> there alone with all the answers. He will never change. He wants to
> be the Lone Ranger. He wants to save Asbury his way, he wants all the
> credit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well, you may be right.
> > Only question I have then is why is voting it down the responsible
> thing?
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The problem is Jack if making that motion (that he knows can not
> be
> > > passed) is somehow showing support for the West Side, isn't he
> > > putting his fellow councilmembers, who have to do the responsible
> > > thing and vote it down, in the postion of being mistaken for
> people
> > > who have no commitment to the West Side?
> > >
> > > That's why it's such a dirty trick.
> > >
> > > I wish JK would address that issue on this board.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With all due respect, I disagree. I saying that he was trying
> to
> > > show a greater commitment,
> > > > no a "trick" Please don't mince my words.
> > > > Thank you.
> > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I son't think you meant to Jack, but your post below actually
> > > agrees
> > > > > with me that it was just a trick Keady was pulling.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone else have an answer here?
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe JK himself would like to weigh in.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Perhaps he was hoping to show the west side a greater
> > > commitment
> > > > > from the town. Is that
> > > > > > so wrong?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > > > > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm going to reserve decision on something JK did last
> night
> > > > > until I
> > > > > > > hear from those on this board that support him.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Someone please tell my why...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Last night with all the people there to complain about
> the
> > > > > east/west
> > > > > > > racial divide, with all the high tension about waht is or
> is
> > > not
> > > > > > > being done on the West Side, why did Jim Keady, without
> > > warning
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > other council members, in front of all, suddenly make a
> > > motion
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > hand the West Side Community Center $100,000.00?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Before you answer, here's some things I do know:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. Jim Keady is the Chair, and Rev. Nunn a member, of the
> > > > > > > Springwoond Avenue Advisory Committee.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2. That Committee, after a year of work, is about 1 month
> > > away
> > > > > from
> > > > > > > a issuing a report for West Side redevelopment. 1 month
> > > away.
> > > > > It is
> > > > > > > supposed to be a very comprehensive plan that will deal
> with
> > > > > > > recreation issues.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3. The City does not own the West Side Community Center,
> a
> > > > > private
> > > > > > > Company does.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 4. With no application sitting in front the Council, no
> > > plans,
> > > > > no
> > > > > > > drawings - nothing - it would be reckless to just cut a
> > > private
> > > > > > > company $100,000.00 of public money on a motion with no
> > > hearing.
> > > > > If
> > > > > > > any other private company received a $100,000.00 donation
> of
> > > > > public
> > > > > > > money, there would certainly (rightfully) be public
> outrage
> > > and
> > > > > > > calls to the prosecutor for investigation.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Here is what I think: JK was pandering. He knew full
> well
> > > there
> > > > > was
> > > > > > > not a chance in the world that his motion would or even
> > > should
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > voted on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > JK wanted the people who were there to say the West
> doesn't
> > > get
> > > > > > > enough, see him ask for $100,000.00 for them, and see the
> > > rest
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the council say no.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That would make him look good, at the cost of stoking the
> > > fires
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the geopgracphic, economic and racial divide. That was
> pure
> > > > > > > political pandering to make him look good even though it
> > > hurt
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > relations among the City's people.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's my theory, but I said I'd reserve decision. If
> that
> > > is
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > why he did it,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Someone, please, tell me why...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
