sharon_b283 wrote:
Tommy, You said, you write opinions for the TCN, right? Yours, or theirs? Personal, or platform/mouthpieceYou said, you write opinions for the TCN, right? Yours, or theirs? Personal, or platform/mouthpiece<WBR>, for the Council members YOU support? Which is it? I'm confused and had stopped reading TCN, because of some of the most blatent slander, I've ever read! That paper goes after a person's character, reputation and misjudges individuals, ALL the time, in a very biased, unfair, manner. I consider it a "gossip" shee opinion,.... 12/5/2006 at 9:47:08 A.M. Eastern Standard Time Thank you, Sharon. I lost count of how many folks I've met because of my similar criticisms over the past few months. Most claim also to have stopped reading that column if not TCN entirely. I have never encountered a single soul, other than the anonymous one(s) in this group, who support those unJustified columns. ========Original Message======== Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: Eminent Domain Date: 12/5/2006 9:47:08 A.M. Eastern Standard Time From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com) Sent on: Tommy, You said, you write opinions for the TCN, right? Yours, or theirs? Personal, or platform/mouthpieceYours, or their members YOU support? Which is it? I'm confused and had stopped reading TCN, because of some of the most blatent slander, I've ever read! That paper goes after a person's character, reputation and misjudges individuals, ALL the time, in a very biased, unfair, manner. I consider it a "gossip" sheet, rather than "fair and balanced", using the FOX Media line, which is neither FAIR or BALANCED. Just my opinion, if you pardon the pun. I would swear you have a vendetta against JK, simply because he tries to help those who can't or don't have the means to help themselves. He is seen as the "voice of the voiceless" in the Black and Hispanic Community, here. He sees our youth hurting and wanting to belong to something, yet, he is the ONLY man I see standing up, for them. You represent the status quo, the almighty dollar and the power elite's, bottom line. He is a Champion, for the little people, in my opinion. --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com) , "justifiedright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com) , "dfsavgny" <dfsavgny@> wrote: > > > Be careful Tom. Are you sure Keady wrote it? > > He is the Chair of the Committee that wrote it. He owns it unless he > comes out and disavows it or at least that part of if. > > >Nice to see you and the > > missus Sat. > > Likewise. How did you get that Angelic women to marry you? ;-) > > > Why don't we you guys just cut this short and just tar and feather > >him [Keady] > > and run him out of town on a rail? > > Don't make any assumptions, friend. Remember my first post about Keady > and E.D. said I'm not offering an opinion right now. My second post > said if he has an opinion closer to mine, I'll compliment him. > > Just to give a bigger hint, I'm waiting and hoping for the opportunity > to compliment him. I just need him to clarify his position. Right now > he has me confused - In June he calls for a statewide halt to E.D. but > now he authors a plan that allows it. I honestly don't know where he > stands and I don't think anyone else does either. > > It could be that I'm wrong about what his position was in June with > respect to E.D. (from private owner to private owner). > > Or, maybe his postion is changed, which is no sin. Reagan started as a > Democrat. If JK's postion has changed he should be OK with saying so. > If it changed and it is more like mine, I'll be happy to compliment > him. I promise I will. > > I don't want him tarred, feathered or run out of town. I like him as a > person (who wouldn't?) and I'm very fond of Ms. Keady too. I just have > some policy differences with him. > > My policy differences with him get highlighted more than others because > I'm charged by the newspaper with writing about AP politics, and it > looks worse because I'm an opinion columnist, not a news reporter. > That just makes it seem like I'm more jazzed about issues than others, > when in fact a curory reading of this board shows that I'm far from > being the most worked-up about AP stuff around here. > > Having to write a column has certainly strained my relationship with > him, but that's a price anyone pays for disagreeing. I wish it wasn't > that way, but it is. I don't see you breaking bread with Jimmy Bruno. > You've said 100 times you have nothing personal against the guy, but > the more you speak out against his politics, the more you open yourself > to a charge that you are just out to get him. It's unavoidable that > people will make that charge against you, no matter how untrue it is. > The same goes for me and JK. I wish it wasn't the case, but I can't do > anything about it. > > Maybe JK will clarify his E.D. position by answering the questions > AsburyCouple posed. He owes them an answer far more than he owes me. >
