--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "asburycheech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> -
> >
It must of killed Robert to do that, that's a team player. It could 
of turned into a Public nightmare if your fight went public. Like I 
said before make sure this guy doesn't elected. Do you think Giberson 
would actually run with this guy? I would doubt it. I can't wait to 
hear why he did what he did. Maybe he did it for the same reason 
Robert voted yes. Nip it at the bud. The Public could have made a 
scene if this guy didn't get appointed.





 -*bd of education meetings were taped in the past, has this practice 
> > stopped?  this started because of franks post about an 
appointment of 
> > hopson, i also do not know him, but know frank is sincere , yet 
he as 
> > been asked several times who voted for this man,  he has posted 
others 
> > yet does not answer this important question, why? it is public 
> > information and will eventually come out, if frank is correct he 
is 
> > wrong to put the blame on the vice president, it takes a 
nomination a 
> > motion to second it and then a vote of the entire bd.
> 
> 
>     You are quite right.  The BOE records the public portions of the
> meeting digitally on CD, which is a matter of public record.  I did
> respond individually re the vote, but not to the whole group.  So 
I'll
> correct that now.  Since there were only seven people on the board
> rather than a full board of nine, it only took four votes to name
> someone to the board.  Garrett nominated Mr. Hopson, Mrs. Sanders
> seconded it, and the other two votes that seated Mr. Hopson were Mr.
> Brewington and the Rev. Smallwood, both (in my opinion) people of 
good
> will and heart.  The last person to get to vote because he is the
> Board President(thank God)is Robert DiSanto.  When the vote got to 
him
> it was, as they say, a fait accompli, so he could either register a
> protest vote or affirm the vote.  He has to try to work with the
> entire board, including Mr. Hopson; Robert's thankless job is akin 
to
> herding cats. Although I certainly cannot speak for him, I can say
> that Robert voted yes, which at that point was the diplomatic thing 
to
> do and in keeping with the "team spirit" admonitions in board 
policy.  
>      The point that is missing here I obviously did not make very
> clear in my initial or subsequent postings.  So I'll try to make it
> less opaque now.  After all four candidates were interviewed in 
public
> (that's an interesting CD right there), the board went into closed
> session, as is permitted, and did the necessary straw polling to
> present what would hopefully be a unified board in public, prevent 
any
> hard feelings on the part of the candidates not chosen, and have an
> expeditious process.  Those executive sessions are not recorded,
> although minutes are kept as the Open Public Meetings Act provides.
> Suffice it to say that what then transpired in public session
> immediately thereafter was not consistent with what had transpired 
in
> closed session.  More than that I cannot say.  Thank God, however,
> there were over a dozen witnesses present in that executive 
session. 
>  I would think the word "treachery" is not an unfair 
characterization
> of what took place that night, and it had nothing whatever to do 
with
> race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.  I have never said that what
> took place was illegal; it most certainly was not.  It is a matter 
of
> honor and integrity.  It certainly cleared up for me once and for 
all
> who I would and wouldn't want to share a foxhole with.
>                                         Frank D'Alessandro
> Sorry for being so long-winded. It's that old retired teacher thing.
>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to