thanks, I think --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > To potential new neighbor Jim, > > A few others here worth reading to add to my previous list. Veteran James > Grabe. He must be cool because the anonymous posters are often slinging > epithets at him. > > Sharon (_b283) too has a fire in her belly for what she believe. She's got a > wonderful life story to tell. And she's not prone to let distortions here > get by here without challenges. > > And then there's Werner, who knows his history, does his research, and > somehow manages to remain unfazed by hits from the anonymous ones. > > In reference to Werner's comment: > > > There are minimal time-tables that were built into the original > redevelopment agreement and then extended and redefined in the DRA. Most all of those > 'deadlines' have been missed. > > > Even the bike guy is worth reading. And there are lots others here who > won't accuse you of stalking or threaten to call the cops on you just vecause you > remember what they post. > > Peace > > > > ========Original Message======== > Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: My new neighbors? Date: 3/8/2007 4:09:40 P.M. Eastern > Standard Time From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com) Sent on: > > > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com) , > Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Ok but there is a deadline on record which has not yet passed. So I > find it irresponsible and wrong to say it is a failure at this point. > > ============ ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== = > > I've been ressting, but I have to jump in here on this. > > Allan, You are serously misinformed about an alleged 30 deadline. > > There are minimal time-tables that were built into the original > redevelopment agreement and then extended and redefined in the DRA. > Most all of those 'deadlines' have been missed. > > Regarding the 30 years figure you are putting forth, it means nothing > in terms of performance. 30 years is simply the statuatory limit of > the effect of the redevelopment plan. The right of eminent domain > expires after 30 years as does any land use and zoning overlays > described in the redevelopment plan. > > To say that the City has given the Master Developer 30 years to > complete his task is just plain wrong. 30 years comes up frequently > when property owners are discussing condemnation. ie "My property is > in limbo for 30 years" refering to the specter of eminent domain. > > Werner > > > > <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free > email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at > http://www.aol.com. >
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/4It09A/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
