Regarding justified's comments.
Mario I think Jack can attest to the fact that I have not had a bad time with anyone on this board in quite sometime. In fact, since you left last time. Now you're back, and again each of your posts have to be laced with your allegagtions of shortcomings of me personally. So of course we argue. It says alot that I've had nothing but nice, polite discussion with all here but you. I never left this group. You did, last spring after some pretty nasty exchanges you had here, especially with someone who disagreed with you. and your response was to accuse the person, continually, of being a drunkard. You returned in October with your first post calling for Keady's resignation: I took issue with your pronouncements about Keady, Zinn's assassination fantasies, the Columbus Day dispute, your claim that the Swiftboating of Kerry was completely justified, your accusations that folks should beware of the conclusions Werner reaches with his facts, Werner "wrecking Asbury Radio," the innuendos about Pallone and Barney Frank, your misuse of a Saddam quote to attack Murtha's position on the war, incomplete reporting on the valedictorian affair to imply schools were run by godless fascists, and questionable anecdotal evidence about the Joe Lewis fight in Germany, Hillary is a racist, religious countries should not be bound by separation of church and state issues.. To interpret those as personal attacks seems bizarre to me. They are about what I consider to be shortcomings about your evidence and/ or conclusions. If a judge disagrees with you on a case, do you take it personally or squeal: "You must hate me"? "Each of my posts was about" you? Is that what they mean by tunnel vision or cherry picking? Many other posts I made had nothing whatsoever to do with you: Asbury Park relevant articles regarding real estate, redevelopment, race relations, education, Canadian geese, and lots more. I also had a few scuffles with Rev Kev; also with the anonymous characters DocP, Ridkid, and rolemover, who, oddly enough, always seem to agree with you. I even complimented you about your comments about the October School Board meeting: "Tommy's response, below, is the most thoughtful and reasonable response to this issue yet to appear in this group" to which you replied "Thank you, friend." Friend or not, I will continue to post my research findings when they contradict you, especially as long as you continue to "Swiftboat" me as some sociopath, psychopath, wacko stalker, godless secularist etc. Challenge my facts if you want; quit with the ad hominem stuff, the red herrings, and the strawmen. In that case, I might simply join others like Asburycouple who simply say "I disagree with what he says," and move on. Peace <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.
