--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
.... I now understand how the APHS must feel after they spent so much time and
> money on the same effort
> What a waste of my time.
...
======================================================
The Fountain was chosen because it was a "safe" project. While I was advocating
for
preservation of Historic Sites in the redevelopment area the APHS was busy
spending over
$30K (yes Thousand) on the fountain and park.
It was not in a redevelopment area, would not be a controversial issue and
would not be
flagged as "anti-development. I always said it was premature considering the
social dynamics
of the area and predicted that it would be destroyed.
Over $30K that could have been spent on a lawsuit or injunction to prevent the
destruction of
Nationally significant historic sites and make this a better redevelopment plan.
Werner
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
