You could be right, because I am not an attorney.
It would require an ex parte' Order!
What I find interesting, is that the mission appealed originally in
chancellry (sp) where Lehre presided. How come yesterday's decision
was made in Lawson's Law Division. Do you know the reason for that?
RD
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "rogersduncan" <rogersduncan@>
> wrote:
> >
> >> That's if the State Supreme or Federal Court does not issue a
Summary
> > Judgement allowing the mission to remain open.
> > RD
> >
>
> Summary Judgment? That's a court order that no factual issues remain
> to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action
in
> a complaint can be decided upon certain facts without trial.
>
> #1, it has to be based upon a party's motion for Summary Judgment. I
> don't think that would be the appropriate means. Perhaps you mean an
> Injunction and an Order to Show Cause.
>
> I hope you are JSRM's attorney.
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
