Jack,
It is not a strip mall...yet.  Currently you have mom & pop retailers.  Many 
are residents of Asbury who want to aid in the rebuilding and have taken risks 
to create these specility shops.  With that being said, who else would open up 
stores on the boardwalk/  This is truely the first summer the boradwalk has a 
direction and it was very late in opening.  Retail works in a cycles.  You will 
have the mom & pop stores and as they build customers, the retail giants then 
move in.  Rents go up and the mom & pops leave.  You see this happen all over.  
If I do recall, MM did mention J Crew as a retailer when they were proposing 
the boardwalk rebuild.  Time will tell.   



----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Pitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:12:26 PM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Help Need with ReVision's productions of HAIR.


I'm sorry that you take issue with my comment, but to me, the 5th Ave. pavilion 
currently 
looks like a strip mall. Does it look better yes, but I think it's been ruined. 
To me, it looks 
throw together, and not faithfully restored according to the plan. It doesn't 
even fit into 
the classic look of CH and the Paramount, nor what the Casino will look like if 
that's ever 
completed.
There are strip malls in this country that have fine dining establishments and 
places like 
you've mentioned, but they are still strip malls. They are all over the Miami 
area.
I honestly think that people are so weary from decades of neglect that the 
boardwalk 
experienced that people have lowered their expectations and are willing to 
accept any 
progress without question. 
Now we have a bandshell that probably doesn't have a future. How is that going 
to be 
resolved? I'm willing to bet that it doesn't get resolved, because people are 
being too 
seduced by what they perceive to be progress. Our city has also been lulled by 
the 
seduction, and they don't appear to have the balls to step up and do anything 
about it.

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "dsher4" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How many strip malls have places like Hot Sand, LaPlaca and two 
> dining establishments that look out onto a beautiful beach/surf. I 
> take issue with that comment.
> 
> I do agree, however, that the bandshell should have a future and it 
> doesn't seem that way now.
> 
> Dan S.
> 
> 
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Jack Pitzer" <hinge98@> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately I'm at work and I can't turn it up load enough to 
> hear the response. What 
> > does it say? It sounds to me like they aren't answering the 
> question Werner posed.
> > Meanwhile, while we're all praising MM for the amazing job they've 
> done, that very praise 
> > is going to overshadow the fact that MM went way past what was 
> supposed to be done and 
> > basically destroyed the 5th Ave. pavilion. Now it's a strip mall 
> with expensive dining. No 
> > bandshell. We might as well kiss the bandshell goodbye, because I 
> really don't see MM 
> > removing the heating and A/C units. And there is no way on earth 
> that the one next to the 
> > stage can be concealed or silenced in any way to make performances 
> up there possible.
> > Once again. our city drops the ball and let's the developers do 
> whatever they want.
> > 
> > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "sandpiper15" <sandpiper15@ > 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "Jack Pitzer" <hinge98@> 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm wondering why this isn't more of an uproar about the 
> current
> > > situation with the
> > > > bandshell.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Actually, if you click here
> > > <http://www.asburyra dio.com/audio/ PublicComment070 208_007.mp3> 
> and FF
> > > to 12:18, I think you'll find the response to Werner's very 
> articulate
> > > and well-founded question regarding the bandshell to be quite 
> uproarious
> > > - in a Marxian sort of way. ("That's in every contract. That's 
> what they
> > > call a sanity clause. - Ha! You can't fool me. There ain't no 
> Sanity
> > > Claus.")
> > >
> >
>

 


      

Reply via email to