JR - You missed the councilman's question. Do you have any facts to 
back up your question????

"Do you also opposed to public resources spent on the Pride Parade?"

Your grammar is a bit off here, but I get your point. As far as I
recall, there were not public resources spent on the Pride Parade, it
was an event that was financed by a non-profit entity and they
applied for permits the same as any other outside group would. Do
you have facts to the contrary?



--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "jwkeady" <james.keady@> wrote:
> 
> > Mr. Deseno, 
> > 
> > I never ceases to amaze me how someone like yourself, who makes 
> >their 
> > living in a profession that demands factual basis for argument, 
has 
> > such a disdain for accurate and truthful statements.  
> 
> Mr. Keady, must you start off personalizing?  
> 
> Speaking of, I note that twice you remark about my grammar in the 
> post below.  I've said many times I post here for leisure.  I have 
> jobs where grammar and spelling are important, and this isn't one 
of 
> them.
> 
> Also when I come across someone not to my own standard for 
grammar, 
> never would I take him or her to task for it in public.  I treat 
> people with dignity and respect.
> 
> Since it appears important to you though, should you ever wish to 
> engage in a contest where proper grammar in writing is the score, 
> just let me know when and where the game begins.
> 
> Now on to substance.
> 
> You said this:
>   
> > You wrote:
> > 
> > "So you don't think the City should expend any money on cultural 
> > events."
> > 
> > I never said this.  Please go back to my previous email and 
> >document 
> > where I made this statement.  I was clear about religious and 
> pseudo-
> > religious events.  I also was clear about why I took issue with 
a 
> > specific cultural event, Columbus Day.    
> 
> Oh I see, Mr. Keady.  You hide your objection to Kwanzaa on "quasi-
> religious."  So you disagree with many on this board (as well as 
Ron 
> Karenga's Kwanzaa website) that it is neither religious nor a 
> replacement for religion.
> 
> Fear not though - the folks on this board who see you in Messiah-
like 
> fashion will not score their disagreement against you.  They will 
> just use it as an excuse to rail at me at the mere thought of 
having 
> to disagree with you.
> 
> Religious vs Cultural aside, I understand you to stand against he 
> City's expenditure of funds for Kwanzaa.
> 
> As I understand you, the reason you go public on the dais against 
> Columbus Day and not Kwanzaa is that you feel the full story about 
> Columbus is not told.  You think of him poorly.
> 
> Let's put aside that I've alerted you to all the "bad" information 
we 
> have about Columbus came from his arch-rival, De Bobadilla, whose 
> claims were debunked back in his own time (yet resurrected today 
by 
> those who wish American history was bad). We can argue that again 
> next October.
> 
> Right now I'm interested in your excuse for bashing just my 
culture 
> as opposed to others.
> 
> You say it is because we don't teach the bad parts of Columbus.
> 
> Well, Ron Karenga the founder of Kwanzaa, was convicted of 
kidnapping 
> and torturing two minority women, beating them with cords, putting 
> hot irons in their mouths and making them drink detergent.  A 
> shocking display of misogyny, cowardice, power, lack of compassion 
> and inhumane action (WWJD?).
> 
> If your excuse for railing against Columbus each year is we should 
> include his bad story in our Columbus celebration, why do you not 
> rail with equal vigor that we include Dr. Karenga's horribleness 
in 
> the Kwanzaa celebration?
> 
> Please tell me you have some legitimate excuse to clear up this 
> glaringly hypocritical position?
> 
> 
> 
> Oh by the way - the Catholic Church financed much of Columbus' 
trip.  
> Did you rail against the church when we were trying to become a 
> Deacon?
> 
> 
>  
> > As I shared in my earlier email, I do not support the City's 
> > expending of any tax-dollars on Christmas, so, your above 
question 
> >to 
> > me is moot.  
> 
> 
> Then what about your thoughts on the private entity, the Chamber, 
> making a decision to excise the name "Christmas" from their 
> celebration while still using trees with lights, stars, wrapped 
> presents and Santa Claus?  
> 
> Do you support the co-opting of culture and changing its name?
> 
> 
> > On a more personal level, as a fellow Christian, I do not think 
> >that 
> > we need the State to edify (by celebrating Christmas) our 
counter-
> > cultural commitments to following the "Good News" of a radical, 
> > itinerant preacher from Galilee (Jesus).  When it comes to this, 
I 
> > think the sage advice of St. Francis of Assisi is worthy of 
> > consideration.  Francis said, "Preach the Gospel at all times 
and 
> > when necessary use words."  
> 
> 
> I seem to recall denying Jesus 3 times before the cock crows being 
a 
> bad thing too.
>



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to