Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On December 23, 2004 02:31 pm, Steven Critchfield wrote:Yes, and the attitude towards TDM400s coming from Digium and professionals in general does not help much to resolve issues with this card.
Untrue. SOHO deployments would make very good use of this card, but I am speccing out T100Ps and channel banks (and all the costs associated with this setup) because these cards are not stable (yet). Being able to put a pair or even three TDM400Ps would be very beneficial to me, and I'm neither a hobby user nor unknowlegeable about the issues at hand. (At least I don't think I am unknowlegeable, perhaps I am?)While I agree, I also must point outI think this is also a case of unprepared users and a not yet polished
- TDM400P - this card seems to be the #1 source of problems. I believe
the FXO module issues are solved but the FXS issues are still around. Hopefully the same fix works.
product. Only those doing small time to hobby deployments use those
cards. You can't expect them to be as knowledgeable as the people
deploying on PRIs. I think both aspects compound the trouble.
Also, treating TDM400 as a hobbyist's toy is not helping to promote this card, while the whole setup considering the price and would-be-performance is unbelievable and has a great potential.
Thank you, Andrei
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
