2007/12/17, bruno randolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > hi nick! > > thanks for the explanations, that makes it a bit more transparent how you > figure that stuff out... > > On Monday 17 December 2007 15:02:05 Nick Kossifidis wrote: > > Bruno can you redo this dump with 802.11b link (CCK) ? It might be > > easier to spot what these registers do (and verify if i'm right about > > the part that disables ofdm weak signal detection). > > sure! here you go: > http://br1.einfach.org/ath/ani2.tgz > > - traces of a 5212 in b and g mode. it also includes traces from 5414 in all > modes (a, b, g). all done in adhoc mode using the current HAL (0.9.30.13). > > please bear in mind that turning ANI on and off has resulted in different > experiences in different setups: turning it *off*, i.e. no ANI has been > reported to work very well and improve thruput in point-to-point links in a > countryside environment, and also in my lab tests using 2 nodes next to each > other thruput increases (11M -> 20M). > > other people report that turning ANI *off* results in bad performance in urban > and multihop environments, especially with omnidirectional antennas. > that kind of makes sense, but it's not really clear (yet?) what the other > factors are. in any case it would be good to have the option to use ANI or > not. > > bruno >
Dumps are the same for b and g, did you use iwpriv ath0 mode 2 to force b mode ? -- GPG ID: 0xD21DB2DB As you read this post global entropy rises. Have Fun ;-) Nick _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
