On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 01:29:55PM -0800, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We'll keep using the ath5k Changes-licensed-under tag until we get > > advice from SFLC if we have done enough to ensure this is no longer > > necessary. For ath9k, if we are not sure if you have read the > > "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" we may ping you with an e-mail > > just to be sure. > > I don't consider any of my changes significant enough to confer copyright, > so by my Signed-off-by, I agree that whatever license the file currently > has is alright by me. Even if the changes were significant, the previous > holds. > > However, if everyone + SFLC prefers that we strictly use > Changes-licensed-under even if we don't claim copyright, then I'll > happily add the tag generator script to a git commit hook :)
Sure, BTW I had created such a script a long time ago, the files just need to be updated (so update them if you download this thingy): http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/scripts/ath5k-license.pl.txt Understood. Luis _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
