On Saturday 29 May 2010 05:27:56 Pavel Roskin wrote: > If we need to add GPL code to ath5k, it could go to a separate file. > But if that separation becomes inconvenient, we could drop BSD > compatibility from ath5k. I don't see any benefit from dual licensing, > unless some existing ath5k contributors are BSD developers who would > stop working on the code in case of relicensing, but I don't think it's > the case.
afaik, one of the reasons for the dual license is that *BSDs (our ancestors from a ath5k point of view) should be able to benefit from improvements we make. this applies mostly to atheros chipset related things, and is irrelevant for linux-only implementation specifics. also we can mix BSD and GPL in one file - see debug.c bruno _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
