Do you remember what version kernel this was fixed in? I can update
the nodes to at least this version and see if it helps...

On my setup, I am not seeing ANY probes from the ath5k nodes at all.
If I start a MadWifi node and the ath5k nodes join it, then bring down
the MadWifi node, the ath5k nodes ALL start beaconing...

Cheers,

--
Jonathan Guerin



On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Bob Copeland <m...@bobcopeland.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:11:14AM +1200, Derek Smithies wrote:
>>> Then on the other machine (Vista) I just located 'myibss' (so beacons
>>> are working) and selected it, then successfully pinged 192.168.10.1.
>> Wrong.
>> If the other machine located your node, then one of the four statements
>> is true:
>
> Ok, fine, I just set up a monitor interface and I see beacons
> (and probe responses) for my setup on that channel.
>
>> A scan should not be necessary - if both ends are put on channel 2462- a
>> scan should not be required - there is no channel changing. Yet - my
>> colleague noted a scan helped nodes to associate.
>
> There was a bug in older kernels that wouldn't fully configure the
> beacons until after a reset, which scanning happens to do.  It's
> possible something similar is going on.
>
> Also, scanning might open a previously passive channel because we might
> get lucky and receive a beacon from another node on it.  The 'iw phy
> phy0 info' can show this kind of thing.
>
> --
> Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to