On Wed October 6 2010 11:45:46 Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2010-10-06 4:25 AM, Bruno Randolf wrote: > > On Wed October 6 2010 07:38:34 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> This is all being sucked out of common, so can we just share the > >> filler for the survey between ath5k and ath9k? Note we should split up > >> hw code and core driver code on the ath module by file. > > > > sure, that would be good! noise floor comes from ath5k_hw though, but > > that can easily be moved to common. > > > > there's so much code which could be shared between ath5k and ath9k... > > That would need sharing of the channel list and some per-channel data > though - so it may need some more code reshuffling...
also - we would need a common way to get ath_common from ieee80211_hw, which works for both ath5k and ath9k. right now each has it's own structures. so... i'd say: later... bruno _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
