> Saying spdif optical is better than spdif coax because high speed > telecoms uses optical makes as much sense as saying my 10 year old > renault is going to be better than your 10 year old honda because > renault won the F1 constructors title this year. That's a pretty bad analogy (both Honda and Renault use the same basic technology - the internal combustion engine, and what we're discussing are two very different basic technologies), but I don't really want to get into this discussion. I don't profess to be an expert in any of these fields - I only got involved in this thread when I read the statements about one conversion being "easier" than the other, which I still consider to be rubbish. As to the actual merits of coax vs toslink, I'll leave that discussion to the experts and those who actually care :)
-- radish ------------------------------------------------------------------------ radish's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=77 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=18772 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
