cvj Wrote: > Just curious - why is WMA Lossless not considered in this discussion - > is it assumed to be inherently inferior to FLAC - or is it just an > oversight?
SqueezeBox Audiophile = 1 part Audiophile Geek + 1 part Computer Geek Therefore, anything with "Windows" in it is inherently inferior. -- ezkcdude ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ezkcdude's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2545 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=21700 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
