ezkcdude Wrote: > Now, you guys are getting into ripping versus encoding. Ripping to WAV > is something you have to do before do FLAC encoding. Errors can occur > during the ripping process, but that is a different issue. Assuming the > WAV file is a bit-for-bit copy, there is no way to produce "lower" > quality FLAC files. All FLAC files are lossless. The 192 or 320 bitrate > is irrelevant for FLAC. That is for mp3 encoding. Ignore it. This really > shouldn't be such a difficult issue, but nobody seems to want to really > listen to those of us who are trying to help. Listen to the words that > are coming out of my mouth: FLAC is lossless. You can't change the > quality of a FLAC-encoded file. You can *slightly* change the size of a > FLAC file, but that has absolutely *no* effect on quality. None. Period.
Roger that. Next question: How do you avoid the copy protection on audio cd's? I've got a bunch of cd's with this useless 'technology'... -- Ali-M ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ali-M's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5844 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24602 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
