seanadams;136660 Wrote: > That's basically it, with the further point I just thought of: adding > passive attenuation would be a bad idea unless the source Z in low. > Really it looks like 100Ω is the way to go - since nobody's > rooting for 1K, I'm going to change it.
This is the right thing to do, as you have "promised" Transporter as a product for audiophiles. We audiophiles are well-accustomed (in fact even relish) the bit of extra care and feeding necessary to use audiophile gear. We are well aware of the fact that you can do something stupid and destroy an amp or speaker. To make a design "idiot proof" at the peril of sonic performance might well be unforgivable in this crowd. Plus, I think you would find that there are many audiophiles like me with mono amps positioned close to speakers. These folks are often the ones who live and breathe this stuff, and are the opinion leaders in the great cyber knowledge base out there. If their stuff doesnt sound good with Transporter, rightly or wrongly, Transporter will quickly get the reputation of not sounding good, period. -- atkinsonrr ------------------------------------------------------------------------ atkinsonrr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7214 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=27445 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
