PhilNYC;141803 Wrote: > Well, a measurement "in realistic settings" is measuring the setting, > not the equipment, no? Mark Levensin (the company) used to post > frequency response measurements "from 1st refection points", and my dad > (a scientist) couldn't stop laughing, because there was no legitimate > way of stating this kind of measurement without describing the room, > the wall materials, etc... > > I do agree that the industry could do more with regards to things like > dispersion patterns et al...mostly has to do with loudspeaker > performance and how they might be affected by in-room factors...
I didn't mean measuring audio from loudspeakers. That is way to complicated to get anything reproducable and comparable. Just the normal electrically measurable parameters, but when everything is hooked up and running. I just disconnected my A/V section from my TacT 2.2x, and, as usual, the CD/SB sound improved massively. -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28080 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
