rjplummer;150288 Wrote: 
> Careful design really doesn't have much to do with it. It's all about
> having 8 spare bits. I realized that I wasn't thinking in stereo, so
> 0.5dB would be 0.25dB/channel. So you could drop the volume much more
> before you lose bits.I'm sorry but you are just completely wrong!  (I'm only 
> bothering to
reply in case someone who doesn't know any better takes you
seriously.)

rjplummer;150288 Wrote: 
> DACs convert numbers into voltages, so every bit does equal 3dB
> (Actually 3.010...dB). That's why people talk about CDs as having a S/N
> ratio of 96dB (16 bits x 2 channels x 3dB). If there's anything
> "carefully designed," it would be that each volume increment
> corresponded to .0502dB (1/6 of a one-bit drop) rather than precisely
> 0.5dB. But this would be the easiest way to implement it.
> 
> Of course at some point you have to worry about the noise level of the
> circuit between your SB and pre-AMP. But that doesn't have anything to
> do with the digital attenuation.Yeah, thanks for the lesson.

(BTW it's ~6dbs per bit (20 x log10), so thats 16 x 6 = 96dbs per
channel - stereo has nothing to do with it!)


-- 
Patrick Dixon

www.at-tunes.co.uk
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=28834

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to