highdudgeon;151261 Wrote: > I don't quite understand the TP's jitter rejection scheme. However, it > is obviously so good, and the analog output so good, that it doesn't > matter. I definitely prefer the all-in-one-box solution...and I was > prepared to prefer the two box solution and see the Transporter as a > compromise.
I'm an engineer, so I simply can't do well having only feedbacks in hand. Perception is important, but unreliable, and for me it should be confirmed somehow, at least theoretically - by correct design. As long as I don't have any clue what Transporter does with incoming jitter I feel uncomfortable. -- 325xi simaudio nova cdp >> simaudio moon i-5 >> revel performa m20 via acoustic zen matrix reference ii and acoustic zen satori -planned additions: sb3 >> deq2496 >> lavry da-10 >> ... or will it be transporter?- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 325xi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5661 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29221 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
